"We are grateful to the Washington Post, the New York Times and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost 40 years, it would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subjected to the lights of publicity during those years, but, the world is more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto-determination practiced in past centuries."
David Rockefeller
Council on Foreign Relations
Black Nobility
Corrupt
“Today, Americans would be outraged if UN troops entered Los Angeles to restore order; tomorrow, they will be grateful. This is especially true if they were told there was an outside threat from beyond, whether real or promulgated, that threatened our very existence. It is then that all people of the world will plead with world leaders to deliver them from this evil….individual rights will be willingly relinquished for the guarantee of their well-being granted to them by their world government.”
Henry Kissinger
Bankster Filth
"We shall have world government whether or not we like it. The only question is whether world government will be achieved by conquest or consent."
James Warburg to the United States Senate Committee on foreign relations, 1950
Corrupt
"Our great industrial nation is controlled by its system of credit. Our system of credit is privately concentrated. The growth of the nation therefore, and all our activities are in the hands of a few men...who necessarily, by very reason of their own limitations, chill and check and destroy genuine economic freedom.
We have come to be one of the most completely controlled and dominated governments in the civilized world - No longer a government of free opinion, no longer a government by conviction and the vote of the majority, but a government by the opinion and the duress of small groups of dominant men."
Woodrow Wilson
War Games, Simulated radar tracks, aircraft exceeding their max operating limits by more than 130-150 knots, inaccurate aircraft position reports, false aircraft target reports, aircraft converging — flying virtually in formation with — and then diverging from reported 9/11 aircraft, fighters launched in the wrong direction, aircraft seemingly still airborne after the alleged attack, poor communications, phones not working…. What happened on the morning of September 11, 2001? Why were our defenses ineffective? Pilots For 9/11 Truth analyze NORAD response, Audio recordings as well as Radar data provided by government agencies.
Visit http://pilotsfor911truth.org to order your own personal high quality copy to share with friends and family. Thank you for your support!
BY: BILL HUGHES 2002 WORLD TRADE CENTER ATTACK
The story of the destruction of the World Trade Center on September
11, 2001, does not begin on that day. It began shortly after World War
One. After the war, Jesuit Edward Mandell House and Woodrow Wilson
created the League of Nations. When U.S. Senator Henry Cabot Lodge
Sr. kept America out of the League. the Jesuits were furious. This must
never happen again. So, in 1921, under the influence of House, an
organization was formed in the United States called the Council on
Foreign Relations (CFR).
This organization attracted people of power, wealth, and influence. It
enlisted politicians, people from the media, and big businessmen. The
ultimate goal of the CFR was to break down all national boundaries and
to establish a one-world system of government. Rear Admiral Chester
Ward, a member of the CFR for 16 years, stated:
The most powerful clique in these elitist groups have one
objective in common — they want to bring about the
surrender of the sovereignty of the national independence of
the United States. — Barry Goldwater, With No Apologies,
William Morrow and Company, page 278.
The Jesuits have always hated America and everything this country
stands for, and they work tirelessly to destroy this country.
The great objective of the CFR was the destruction of American
sovereignty and constitutional liberties. To accomplish this, both the
Republican and Democratic parties were to be controlled, and a central
bank was to be created, the Federal Reserve Bank.
When a new President comes on board, there is a great
turnover in personnel, but no change in policy. Example:
During the Nixon [a Republican] years Henry Kissinger, CFR
member and Nelson Rockefeller’s protégé, was in charge of
foreign policy. When Jimmy Carter [a Democrat] was
elected, Kissinger was replaced by Zbigniew Brzezinski,
CFR member and David Rockefeller’s protégé. — Ibid. page
279.
The Jesuits have been extremely successful in carrying out the
purposes of the papacy’s malignant Congress at Vienna, Verona, and
Chieri. The Jesuits, with the aid of their CFR, control the highest of
echelons in the political, judicial, business, banking, media, and
religious arenas in the United States. Their plans are right on schedule.
When they failed to get America into the League of Nations after World
War One, they created the CFR, which began immediately to use the
schools, colleges, and the media to condition Americans to accept the
Jesuits’ second attempt to create a world government after World War
Two. America was so conditioned by then that they accepted the
United Nations, and joined.
The Jesuits’ CFR is extremely dangerous to the continued existence of
the American Republic. A few patriots like Chester Ward and President
Kennedy rejected their malicious plans and fought their agenda.
Kennedy paid for his disobedience to the Jesuits with his life. Some of
the past CFR members who were either Jesuits or Jesuit pawns to do
their bidding are Dwight D. Eisenhower, Richard Nixon, Adlai
Stevenson, Hubert Humphrey, and George McGovern. Current
members of the Jesuit CFR include Federal Reserve Bank chairman
Alan Greenspan, Congressmen Newt Gingrich and Richard Gephardt,
both presidents George Herbert Walker Bush and his son, George
Walker Bush, Vice president Dick Cheney, Secretary of State Colin
Powell, Supreme Court justice Sandra Day O’Connor, Joseph
Lieberman, and John Chafee. (Chafee was the man who introduced gun
laws after Waco, remember?) Bill Clinton, of course, is a member of
the CFR.
Major companies under Jesuit/CFR control include the Ford Motor
Company, Boeing Corporation, Pepsi-Cola, Heinz Co., Lockheed-Martin,
Time Warner, and Chevron. In the media, NBC, CBS, N.Y. Times,
Washington Post, Newsweek, and Time, are just a few media outfits
dominated by the Jesuits. All these organizations promote the Jesuits’
plan for destroying America. Some top media people who promote the
Jesuit Plan include Tom Brokaw, Barbara Walters, David Brinkley, John
Chancellor, Katharine Graham, and Ted Koppel, all CFR members.
John Swinton, Chief of Staff for the New York Times, who is considered
to be the dean of his profession, made a most bold confession. In
1953, at a New York Press Club, he declared,
There is no such thing, at this date of the world’s history, in
America, as an independent press. You know it, and I know
it. There is not one of you who dares to write your honest
opinions, and if you did, you know beforehand that it would
never appear in print. I am paid weekly for keeping my
honest opinion out of the paper I am connected with. Others
of you are paid similar salaries for similar things, and any of
you who would be so foolish as to write honest opinions
would be out on the streets looking for another job. If I
allowed my honest opinions to appear in one issue of my
newspaper, before twenty-four hours my occupation would
be gone. The business of the journalists is to destroy the
truth; to lie outright; to pervert; to vilify; to fawn at the feet of
mammon, and to sell his country and his race for his daily
bread. You know it, and I know it and what folly is this
toasting an independent press? We are the tools and
vassals of rich men behind the scenes. We are the jumping
jacks, they pull the strings and we dance. Our talents, our
possibilities and our lives are all the property of other men.
We are intellectual prostitutes. — Multiple contributors, A U.
S. Police Action: Operation Vampire Killer, The American
Citizens and Laumen Association, pp. 18,19, (emphasis
supplied).
Swinton explained so well that the media are under the control of the
rich. We have previously shown that the richest people in America are
either Jesuits or are under their control. The Jesuits are telling us, via
the newspapers, magazines, and every other mass-media
communication outlet, exactly what they want us to believe. One of
their biggest efforts is to make the people of the world believe that the
pope is the great man of peace, when, in reality, the pope and his
Jesuits are working constantly to establish the pope as the supreme
dictator of the world as he was in the Dark Ages. When they
accomplish this, the horrible persecution by the papacy in the Dark
Ages will return. Americans are being beguiled to give up their
constitutional civil liberties and their country. The tragedies we are
witnessing today are blamed on terrorists, but these terrorist
organizations have been infiltrated and controlled by the Jesuits. This
very effectively covers up the footprints of the papacy in these
tragedies.
Let us now turn to the destruction of the World Trade Center on
September 11, 2001. Along with the total destruction of the World
Trade Center, thousands of innocent people died. The negative impact
on America and its economy has been devastating. Multiple businesses
have been ruined by the fallout.
In order to defend against future attacks like this, the United States
Government made a feeble attempt to find the perpetrators of this
atrocity in Afghanistan. But their major thrust in this war against
terrorism has been to take away what is left of the rights and liberties
of American citizens. For some unexplained reason, if the civil rights of
American citizens are taken away, there isn’t supposed to be any more
terrorism. This onslaught against Americans has come from the White
House, the Justice Department, Congress, and the news media. The
people in government take a solemn oath to defend and obey the
Constitution of the United States, but their oath has been shown to be
a gigantic lie. They totally and completely ignore the constitution as
they pass their destructive legislation and executive orders.
From the beginning of his presidency, George Bush has been
promoting the Jesuit agenda. Two months into his presidency,
surrounded by cardinals of Rome, the President dedicated a cultural
center in Washington, D.C. to the greatest enemy this Republic has
ever had — the pope of Rome. Bush declared that he is going to
enforce the words and teachings of the pope here in America.
The best way to honor Pope John Paul II, truly one of the
great men, is to take his teachings seriously, to listen to his
words and put his words and his teachings into action here
in America! — Patricia Zapoa, Catholic News Service, March
24, 2001.
John Paul’s words and teachings represent the plan to destroy Protestantism, to destroy the Constitution of the United States, and to
restore his throne as universal monarch. By his own words, we see that
George Bush is carrying out the plan of the Jesuits to destroy America.
In 1960, John Kennedy went from Washington to Texas to
assure Protestant preachers that he would not obey the pope. In 2001, George Bush came from Texas up to Washington to assure a group of Catholic bishops that he
would obey the pope. — Washington Times, April 16, 2001.
Who is calling the shots in Washington, D.C.? If we think it is the President of the U.S., we are deceiving ourselves.
The pope is the ruler of the world. All the emperors, all the kings, all the princes, all the presidents of the world are as
these altar boys of mine. — Priest D. S. Phelan, Western
Watchman, June 27, 1912
Should we be surprised if Bush and his fellow altar boys are pushing
the Jesuit program? Should we be surprised to see Bush issuing
executive orders that destroy constitutional liberties? Should we be
surprised to see Congress passing laws that destroy constitutional
liberties?
This is alarming information. The highest echelons in the United States
Government, the highest echelons in business and finance, and the
highest echelons in the schools, colleges, and media, are all claiming to
be Americans. They are all claiming to be working for the betterment of
America. They are all claiming to be working for the preservation of the
Constitution. In fact, they are under the control of the Jesuits, the
most implacable enemies of this Republic. With a patriotic and religious
facade, they are secretly leading America to ruin. Deception is being
practiced by the most sinister of foes, the Jesuits of Rome.
It is here that the tremendous power of the church makes
itself felt. It is through this direction [Jesuits] that statesmen
are compelled to act, not for the benefit of the country to
which they belong, but for the benefit of the Church, which
controls them. — M. F. Cusack, The Black Pope, Marshall,
Russell, and Co., p. 106.
What has happened in the aftermath of the World Trade Center
destruction? The day after the center was destroyed the Orlando
Sentinel writes,
Experts, however, say there is much work to be done. And it
will involve much more spending and planning, hardening of
key facilities and, perhaps, higher taxes and forfeiture of
some personal freedoms. — Tighter Security Means Less
Freedom, Orlando Sentinel, Wednesday, September 12th,
(emphasis supplied).
As the United States faces a new war against uncertain and
hidden enemies, the temptation to sacrifice our freedom in
the hopes of protecting ourselves from harm is powerful.
The danger is that we will end up neither safe nor free.
The constitutional protections of speech and privacy that
Americans value so highly reflect a balance between
individual liberty and state security. Just how those lines are
drawn, history teaches, is directly affected by the perceived
threats to our country’s security….
We’re faced with real threats to national security. The
challenge is to meet those threats without endangering our
constitutional character or undermining the freedom and
liberty that are the source of our power. — USA Today,
Thursday, Sept. 13, 2001 (emphasis supplied).
Freedom or safety? Anti terrorism measures may mean
forfeiture of some personal freedoms. — Orlando Sentinel,
Wednesday, September 12th, (emphasis supplied).
In the reader forum of the Orlando Sentinel, Sept. 12th, the question
was raised, “What personal freedoms would you give up to fight
terrorism?” One person, the next day, wrote in and said, “I have no
problem with having to give up something for the greater good of
myself and my brothers and sisters.” This person does not realize that
as the government usurps more and more power; liberty, freedom,
and safety decrease in direct proportion. This person does not realize
that when the government has all the power, no one is safe, and
bloody persecution is the result. Remember Waco?
The main purpose of the World Trade Center tragedy was to make
American citizens willing to give up their freedoms. The World Trade
Center attack was necessary because the bombing in Oklahoma did not
panic the American people enough to get more of the desired so-called
‘antiterrorism laws’ passed.
Virginia Sloan realized that if the terrorists wanted to attack
American freedoms they had got some where…
Civil libertarians expect renewed calls for a national
identification card….
And that means storing all the face data collected,
something civil libertarians fear will allow the government to
track any individual. If systems were set up all over a city,
you could be ‘checkpointed’ by camera when you board a
train, stop at a cash machine and enter a store, or the place
where you work. — Time Magazine, Sept. 24, 2001.
One of the scary things about face recognition is that it is notoriously
unreliable. You might be identified as a terrorist because the machine
made a mistake.
Some of the staunchest defenders of individual rights, most
notably the American Civil Liberties Union, so far have been
silent on the issue. The organization forbade its officials from
publicly speculating last week on possible fallout from
Tuesday’s tragedy. The ACLU instead issued a brief
statement urging ‘our leaders to continue to uphold the
principles of liberty the nation holds dear as they pursue
those responsible for this devastating attack on American
soil.’
Privately, libertarians are worried the stampede for added
security will trample cherished freedoms. They point out
some of the proposals making the rounds already were
considered and rejected by the government in the wake of
the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing….
An April 1995 Los Angeles Times poll immediately after the
bombing found 49 percent of those surveyed thought it
would be ‘necessary for the average person to give up some
civil liberties.’ 43 percent disagreed. A follow-up poll…11
months later found only 30 percent still thought civil liberties
would have to be sacrificed and 65 percent said it was
unnecessary. — Orlando Sentinel, September 13, 2001.
There has been an onslaught of media articles and statements
suggesting the giving up of certain civil liberties just as the Jesuit
agenda requires. On October 26, 2001, George Bush signed the
misnamed USA Patriot Act of 2001, which was proposed five days after
the tragedy. Just six weeks after the World Trade Center was
destroyed, this bill was passed. This is truly amazing. It is virtually
impossible for a bill to be conceived, written, debated, and passed this
quickly. You see, they already had the bill written before the tragedy
occurred.
The bill enhances the ability of federal authorities to tap
phones, share intelligence information, track Internet usage,
e-mails and cell phones and protect U.S. borders. — Bush
Signs Sweeping New Laws to Combat Terrorism, Reuters
News Service, October 26, 2001.
Laura Murphy of the American Civil Liberties Union stated in that
article, “We cannot as a nation allow very legitimate public anxiety to
immunize the administration and Congress from their obligation to
protect the Bill of Rights and the fundamental values that document
embodies.” In the name of fighting terrorism, the government is taking
away Constitutional liberties and freedoms just as fast as they can.
This will lead to terrible persecution in the United States, which will be
much worse than the physical tragedies themselves.
Lawmakers upset with some of the administrations antiterrorism actions will question Attorney General John Ashcroft on the matter.
[Certain Congressmen] say the administration’s actions have
gone too far in infringing on civil liberties. — USA Today,
November 26, 2001, (emphasis supplied).
In the same paper, on the same day, there’s a cartoon of two children,
decorating a Christmas tree. One sings, “He sees you when you are
sleeping, He knows when you are awake, He knows if you have been
bad or good….” The other child says, “Enough about Attorney General
Ashcroft already!”
In America, in the last eight years, there have been three terrible
tragedies: Waco, Oklahoma City, and the World Trade Center. In every
case, the government’s solution to the problems has been greatly
increased government power and the loss of Constitutional liberties
and freedoms. In this short time period of eight years, we have seen a
very serious despoiling of the Constitution, the greatest document ever
created by men. An insidious war is raging against Constitutional
liberty in America. In the aftermath of the World Trade Center
destruction, this certainly has been the focal point of politicians and
media. Claiming to be loyal Americans, agents of the Jesuits in
Congress and the media have been carrying out the their plan to
destroy America with almost no opposition.
Remember, the Jesuits are totally antagonistic to the American
Constitution and everything it stands for. Charles Chiniquy says,
Long before I was ordained a priest, I knew that my church
was the most implacable enemy of this republic.
My professors… had been unanimous in telling me that the
principles and laws of the Church of Rome were absolutely
antagonistic to the principles which are the foundations
stones of the Constitution of the United States of America. —
Charles Chiniquy, Fifty Years in the Church of Rome, Chick
Publications, p. 283.
Watch carefully as Chiniquy compares the distinctions between the two.
1st. The most sacred principle of the United States Constitution is the equality of every citizen before the law.
But the fundamental principle of the Church of Rome is the
denial of that equality.
2nd. Liberty of conscience is proclaimed by the United
States, a most sacred principle which every citizen must
uphold, even at the price of his blood. But liberty of
conscience is declared by all the popes and councils of
Rome, a most godless, unholy, and diabolical thing, which
every good Catholic must abhor and destroy at any cost.
3rd. The American Constitution assures the absolute
independence of the civil from the ecclesiastical or church
power; but the Church of Rome declares that such
independence is an impiety and revolt against God.
4th. The American Constitution leaves every man free to
serve God according to the dictates of his conscience; but
the Church of Rome declares that no man has ever had
such a right, and that the pope alone can know and say what
man must believe and do.
5th. The Constitution of the United States denies the right for
anybody to punish any other for differing from him in religion;
but the Church of Rome says that she has the right to punish
with the confiscation of their goods, or the penalty of death,
those who differ in faith from the pope.
6th. The United States have established schools all over
their immense territories, where they invite the peoples to
send their children, that they may cultivate their intelligence
and become good and useful citizens. But the Church of
Rome has publicly cursed all those schools, and forbidden
their children to attend them, under pain of excommunication
in this world and damnation in the next.
7th. The Constitution of the United States is based on the
principle that the people are the primary source of all civil
power. But hundreds of times, the Church of Rome has
proclaimed that this principle is impious and heretical. She
says that all government must rest upon the foundation of
the Catholic faith; with the pope alone as the legitimate and
infallible source and interpreter of the law. — Ibid. p. 284.
We saw that the President of the United States declared in the
Washington Times that he is going to obey the pope. If so, he must
destroy the Constitution. In the aftermath of the destruction of the
World Trade Center, Bush has apparently been following the pope’s
agenda to the letter.
Nothing is plainer than that, if the principles of the church of
Rome prevail here, our Constitution would fall. The two
cannot exist together. They are in open and direct
antagonism with the fundamental theory of our government
and of all popular government everywhere. — Richard
Thompson, The Papacy and the Civil Power, quoted in Fifty
Years in the Church of Rome, p. 285,
If Catholics ever gain a sufficient numerical majority in this
country, religious freedom is at an end. — The Shepherd of
the Valley, official journal of the Bishop of St. Louis,
November 23rd, 1851.
The destruction of the World Trade Center and the destruction of the
Murrah building in Oklahoma City were planned events for the specific
purpose of creating terror in America so that Americans, in fear, would
give away their Constitutional liberties and freedoms. The Jesuits’ plan
is working extremely well. With politicians, schools and colleges, the
media, and big corporations in their hands, America is being rapidly
defeated by the enemy within.
As American troops prepared to do battle with an extreme Moslem
faction in Afghanistan, USA Today quoted the President as saying, “his
administration is readying a crusade against terrorism.” (USA Today,
September 17, 2001.)
A crusade? Crusades were Catholic holy wars fought during the Dark
Ages against Moslem hordes who refused to relinquish Jerusalem to the
pope. What does George Bush mean by a crusade? Alberto Rivera, an
ex-Jesuit priest, in his crusader series, has made it clear that the
Vatican created Islam to destroy Christians and Jews, protect Roman
Catholics, and to capture Jerusalem for the pope. For the first few
hundred years of their existence, Islam did just that. When it came
time for the powerful generals of the Islamic armies to surrender
Jerusalem to the pope, they, realizing their power, refused to give it
up. Thus, the papacy created the Crusades to drive the Islamic forces
out of Jerusalem, and establish the throne of the pope in Jerusalem.
Why a crusade now? Why are America and extremist Islamic factions
fighting? There are three things the Jesuits wish to accomplish from
this situation. As we have seen, the Constitution has been a thorn in
their side for hundreds of years; they want it destroyed completely. By
continuing to create terror in America, the Jesuits will one day get their
ultimate goal. They also want to pay back the Islamic extremists for
disobeying them when they didn’t give the pope Jerusalem when he
wanted it. Finally, war will continue in the Middle East until the weary
multitudes of the world cry out for a peaceful solution to the conflict.
When that time arrives, guess who will be considered the only
peacemaker whose presence in Jerusalem would bring the long coveted
peace? Placing the pope as leader in that troubled region will appear to
be the only answer because the controlled press/media will have
conditioned everyone to the idea. So, the pope will reign in Jerusalem;
mission accomplished.
Let us consider Osama bin Laden. Bin Laden was aided by America
during the Afghan-Soviet conflict in the 1980s and was fighting with
America during the Balkan conflict in the late 1990s. Overwhelming
information reveals bin Laden’s business ties to the Bush family, and
he has had contact with the CIA as late as July, 2000. Osama bin
Laden is a plant just like Lee Harvey Oswald and Timothy McVeigh
were plants. He is being used as the patsy to keep the blame away
from where it really belongs — the Jesuits of the papacy.
Milt Bearden, an ex-CIA Afghanistan operations director and bin
Laden’s intelligence advisor, was interviewed by Dan Rather on
September 12, 2001. Rather wanted Bearden to state that bin Laden
was responsible for the World Trade Center disaster. Bearden stated,
“If they didn’t have an Osama bin Laden, they would invent one.”
Recently, Rick Wiles, speaker for the American Freedom News,
interviewed Dr. Koryagina, the economic advisor to Vladimir Putin,
leader of Russia. In the interview, she discussed secret societies,
criminal and religious organizations that are controlling the world. She
also declared that there is a shadow government seeking to bring down
the United States and bring in world government. She warned in
Moscow, in July of 2001, that the United States would be attacked. She
said that when the American people wake up to what is happening to
them, and who did it, they will be in a state of shock. “Everybody
knows about organized crime and the Mafia. Also people have known
for a long time about secret societies and so forth. During my research,
I started to notice that those structures can be put together and can be
joined. And I realized that right now, we have a criminal monster, a
hybrid of organized crime, Mafia and secret societies that have merged
together.” (aired December 6, 2001)
Will we listen to the words of this renowned Russian economist? Secret
societies are bringing all these agencies together to create a one world
government. When America figures it out, they will be in shock. Dr.
Koryagina said everything but naming the secret society that is calling
the shots, and who masterminded the World Trade Center destruction.
The Jesuits of Rome.
U.S. Court to Hear Conspiracy Case against Cheney, Rumsfeld
Military officer April Gallop, who survived the 9/11 terrorist attack at the Pentagon, has charged Bush administration officials with conspiring to carry out the event. Tomorrow, her case will be heard in Federal Court:
Top Secret Military Specialist April Gallop saw disturbing things up close that have not been reported in the media.
On the morning of September 11, 2001, she was ordered by her supervisor to go directly to work at the Pentagon, before dropping off her ten-week-old son Elisha at day care…
Escaping through the hole reportedly made by Flight 77, she saw no signs of an aircraft – no seats, luggage, metal, or human remains. Her watch (and other clocks nearby) had stopped at 9:30-9:31 a.m., seven minutes before the Pentagon was allegedly struck at 9:38 a.m.
The 9/11 Commission reported that “by no later than 9:18 a.m., FAA centers in Indianapolis, Cleveland, and Washington were aware that Flight 77 was missing and that two aircraft had struck the World Trade Center.”
Why then were there no anti-aircraft defenses, Gallop asks, or alarm warnings inside the Pentagon?
…On April 5th, 2011, at 11 a.m., at the Federal Courthouse at 141 Church Street in New Haven, Connecticut, the case of Gallop v. Cheney, Rumsfeld, and Myers will be heard by the United States Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit.
Gallop’s case will bring legal scrutiny upon many Bush administration claims about the attacks which were previously assumed to be fact.
Ms. Gallop will, through photographic and other physical evidence, as well as the testimony of a multitude of military and civilian survivors, demonstrate the impossibility of her having lived through the attack on the Pentagon if it had taken place as the government and the defendants claim…
“No independent court has applied legal procedures to review the available evidence on who was responsible for the attacks.”
Also, that “it is not acceptable for a constitutional state…to declare war, bomb a foreign country, and place it under military occupation,” without first identifying suspects.
Dieseroth also said the U.S. “was under burden of proof” that Osama bin Laden was responsible for the attacks, yet the FBI admits it has no evidence presentable in court to back this up.
by IndepEnergy, Mon Apr 04, 2011 at 07:54:52 PM EDT
Osama Bin Laden Was Exploring Plans To Attack Obama On 9/11 Anniversary: Reports
Prior to his death earlier this year, Osama bin Laden was exploring plans to target President Barack Obama on the tenth anniversary of the September 11, 2001 attacks, according to multiple reports.
A raid of bin Laden’s Pakistan compound in May reportedly turned up documents showing that the al Qaeda leader had his sight set on attacking the president. CBS News reports:
A U.S. official confirmed to CBS News correspondent Bob Orr Friday that intelligence gathered during the May 2 raid on bin Laden’s compound in Pakistan revealed that the al Qaeda head discussed with his operations planners a wide array of potential attacks against the U.S. and senior American officials.
On the heels of the raid, the AP reported that the Navy SEALs involved in the operation helicoptered out of the compound with documents, computer files, and additional information that they hoped would provide intelligence to bolster the fight to weaken and destroy the larger al Qaeda network.
According to reports released on Friday, the documents show plans were being taken under consideration to attack Obama while he was traveling by aircraft. Officials told ABC News that Air Force One and Marine One were discussed as potential targets.
The documents reportedly suggest that General David Petraeus was another potential target for an attack on September 11 of this year. CNN reports that Petraeus declined to comment on the matter through a spokesman on Friday.
The Washington Post recently reported on some of the revelations from materials collected at bin Laden’s compound:
Toward the end of his decade in hiding, Osama bin Laden was spending as much time exchanging messages about al-Qaeda’s struggles as he was plotting ways for the terrorist network to reassert its strength.
Over the past year, the al-Qaeda leader fielded e-mails from followers lamenting the toll being taken by CIA drone “explosions” as well as the network’s financial plight, according to U.S. officials who have completed an exhaustive review of the trove of bin Laden files collected at his compound after the May 2 U.S. raid that killed him.
This is a developing story… More information to come… JUST AS SOON AS U.S. OFFICIALS CAN MAKE IT UP! SO YOU WILL STAY INLINE AND NOT ASK ANY QUESTIONS ABOUT THE FASCIST REGIME THAT IS MORE COMMONLY KNOWN AS THE U.S. GOVERNMENT
"The real menace of our republic is this invisible government which like a giant octopus sprawls its slimy length over city, state and nation. Like the octopus of real life, it operates under cover of a self created screen...At the head of this octopus are the Rockefeller Standard Oil interests and a small group of powerful banking houses generally referred to as International Bankers. This little coterie of powerful international bankers virtually run the United States government for their own selfish purposes. They practically control both political parties."
- John F. Hylan, New York City Mayor, 1922
Woodrow Wilson, 1913
"Since I entered politics, I have chiefly had men's views confided to me privately. Some of the biggest men in the United States, in the field of commerce and manufacture, are afraid of something. They know that there is a power somewhere so organized, so subtle, so watchful, so interlocked, so complete, so pervasive, that they better not speak above their breath when they speak in condemnation of it."
- Woodrow Wilson, 1913
Thomas Jefferson
"If the people let the government decide what foods they eat and what medicines they take, their bodies will soon be in as sorry a state as the souls who live under tyranny"
Thomas Jefferson (1778)
General Douglas MacArthur
“I am concerned for the security of our great nation, not so much because of any threat from without, but because of the insidious forces working from within.”
General Douglas MacArthur
Thomas Jefferson
A Bill of Rights is what the people are entitled to against every government, and what no just government should refuse, or rest on inference.